North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N0432: phase II trial of docetaxel with capecitabine and bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (T; Taxotere) with capecitabine (X) is active against metastatic breast cancer (MBC); bevacizumab (BV) has demonstrated efficacy with taxanes in the first-line setting. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of TX-BV in patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received first-line bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice per day on days 1-14 every 21 days. Primary and secondary end points were tumor response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 45 assessable patients received TX-BV for a median of seven cycles. Two complete and 20 partial responses were observed (overall RR 49%); nine patients had stable disease >6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 69%. Median response duration was 11.8 months. Median OS and PFS were 28.4 and 11.1 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events included hand-foot syndrome (29%), fatigue (20%), febrile neutropenia (18%), and diarrhea (18%). In cycles 3-10, median dose levels of docetaxel and capecitabine were 60 mg/m(2) and 660 mg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSION: TX-BV demonstrated significant activity; dose modifications were required to manage drug-related toxic effects.

Southwest Oncology Group Study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma: the importance of survival as a clinical trial end point.

PURPOSE: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has promising activity and acceptable toxicity. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in a cooperative group setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced TCC were treated every 21 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), administered as a 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin dosed to an area under the curve of 5. Prior systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy was not permitted unless completed at least 1 year before enrollment. Patients were evaluated for response every three cycles, and follow-up was conducted to determine survival. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and were assessable. Four (14%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Node-only disease was present in 24%, and 76% of patients had extranodal disease. The median number of cycles received was five. Grade 4 toxicity consisted primarily of neutropenia (38% of patients). Neurologic toxicity was noted in 16 patients (grade 1 in four patients, grade 2 in five patients, grade 3 in six patients, and grade 4 in one patient). Six partial responses and no complete responses were noted, for a response proportion of 20.7% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 40%). Median progression-free survival time was 4 months, and overall survival time was 9 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced TCC is reasonably well tolerated. However, a response proportion considerably lower than that previously reported was noted. In addition, the median survival time of 9 months was less than the survival time previously reported for patients treated with the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Although our results may reflect enrollment of patients with poor prognostic features, they also call into question the utility of this regimen.

Evaluation of docetaxel in previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial.

PURPOSE: This phase II multi-institutional trial of the Southwest Oncology Group was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer were entered onto the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion repeated every 21 days, with protocol-specified dose reductions for toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were eligible. A total of 158 cycles of docetaxel were administered (median, three cycles; range, one to nine). Ten patients (23%) (95% confidence interval, 12% to 39%) achieved partial responses. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 3 and 9 months, respectively. Therapy was generally well tolerated. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 58% of patients. Febrile neutropenia developed in five patients (12%), and infection was documented in 14% of patients. There was one treatment-related death caused by pneumonia in a patient who had developed bilateral pneumothoraces. Other toxicities (grade 3/4) included malaise, fatigue, and lethargy (21%); nausea (19%); stomatitis (14%); edema (9%); and sensory neuropathy (9%). DISCUSSION: Docetaxel, at a dose of 100 mg/m2, is an active agent in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Reversible neutropenia is the most common toxicity associated with this treatment. The overall survival (9 months) with this agent is comparable to that reported with other new chemotherapeutic agents in small cell lung cancer and warrants additional evaluation of docetaxel in combination therapy.

Generative character of perception: a neural architecture for sensorimotor anticipation.

The basic idea of our anticipatory approach to perception is to avoid the common separation of perception and generation of behavior and to fuse both aspects into a consistent neural process. Our approach tries to explain the phenomenon of perception, in particular, of perception at the level of sensorimotor intelligence, from a behavior-oriented point of view. Perception is assumed to be a generative process of anticipating the course of events resulting from alternative sequences of hypothetically executed actions. By means of this sensorimotor anticipation, it is possible to characterize a visual scenery immediately in categories of behavior, i.e. by a set of actions which describe possible methods of interaction with the objects in the environment. Thus, the competence to perceive a complex situation can be understood as the capability to anticipate the course of events caused by different action sequences. Starting from an abstract description of anticipatory perception and the essential biological evidence for internal simulation, we present two biologically motivated computational models that are able to anticipate and evaluate hypothetically sensorimotor sequences. Both models consider functional aspects of those cortical and subcortical systems that are assumed to be involved in the process of sensory prediction and sensorimotor control. Our first approach, the Model for Anticipation based on Sensory IMagination (MASIM), realizes a sequential search in sensorimotor space using a simple model of lateral cerebellum as sensory predictor. We demonstrate the efficiency of this model approach in the light of visually guided local navigation behaviors of a mobile system. The second approach, the Model for Anticipation based on Cortical Representations (MACOR), is actually still at a conceptual level of realization. We postulate that this model allows a completely parallel search at the neocortical level using assemblies of spiking neurons for grouping, separation, and selection of sensorimotor sequences. Both models are intended as general schemes for anticipation based perception at the level of sensorimotor intelligence.

Randomized phase III study of 5-fluorouracil plus high dose folinic acid versus 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid plus methyl-lomustine for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer is generally incurable. The most active regimen available, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (Leucovorin), produces response rates of approximately 25% to 30%. Methyl-lomustine is a nitrosourea with modest activity against colorectal cancer. A randomized trial was undertaken to evaluate the impact the addition of methyl-lomustine would have on response, duration of survival, and survival rates in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: The methyl-lomustine/5-FU/Leucovorin (MFL) regimen consisted of methyl-lomustine (110 mg/m2), administered on Day 1 of each 8-week cycle with six weekly boluses of 5-FU (600 mg/m2), and Leucovorin (500 mg/m2). The FL treatment arm consisted of the administration of 5-FU and Leucovorin as described above. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity after each 8-week cycle. RESULTS: Of 319 patients included in this trial, 297 (93.1%) had disease evaluable for response and toxicity: 145 received MFL, and 152 received FL. In this trial, 526 courses of MFL and 529 courses of FL were administered. Methyl-lomustine/5-FU/Leucovorin treatment resulted in 4 complete and 30 partial responses (response rate, 21.9%), and FL treatment resulted in 9 complete and 33 partial responses (response rate, 26.4%). There was no significant difference in median survival duration between patients in the two arms (MFL = 48 weeks, FL = 51 weeks). However, MFL was significantly more toxic with greater myelosuppression than was FL (Grade 3-4 neutropenia: MFL = 56 patients, FL = 27 patients, P < 0.001; Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: MFL = 49 patients, FL = 2 patients, P < 0.001; Grade 3-4 anemia: MFL = 15 patients, FL = 6 patients, P < 0.001; and more prolonged median duration of granulocytopenia: MFL = 9 days, FL = 7 days, P < 0.001; and thrombocytopenia: MFL = 14 days, FL = 7.5 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Because the addition of methyl-lomustine in the MFL schedule markedly increased the toxicity of the regimen and because the FL regimen was as effective as MFL, the authors recommend that Leucovorin and 5-FU remain the treatment choice for treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Phase II study of taxol in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Taxol, a complex plant product (a diterpene) extracted from the bark of Taxus brevifolia, has demonstrated substantial anticancer activity in ovarian and breast cancers, malignant melanoma, and acute myelogenous leukemia. Due to allergic reactions in phase I and early phase II studies, use of a 24-hour infusion of taxol with prophylactic dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine has been recommended. PURPOSE: In this phase II study, we attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of taxol in patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer who had never received chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were not excluded because of prior surgery or because of radiotherapy administered more than 4 weeks before study entry. Taxol was administered in the hospital at a dose of 200 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 24 hours and repeated every 3 weeks, provided that patients had recovered from any toxic effects. Dexamethasone, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine were given before chemotherapy to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Therapy was continued for at least two courses unless there was rapid disease progression and for at least three courses if no change was observed and no grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred. Treatment was continued for six more courses after maximum response or for two more courses after complete remission but was discontinued if disease progressed. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients entered in the study, 25 were assessable for toxic effects and response. One patient had an allergic reaction that was not life threatening. The overall response rate was 24% (one complete response and five partial responses). An additional seven patients (28%) had minor response. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, and neutropenic fever occurred in eight of 118 courses. One additional patient developed neutropenic sepsis with hypotension but recovered with intensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Taxol appears to have activity against non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. IMPLICATIONS: A phase II study combining taxol, etoposide, and cisplatin and using hematopoietic stimulating factors is now proposed. The optimal dose for combination chemotherapy has yet to be determined. An important consideration is potential cardiac effects of taxol with other drugs.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation due to intravenous administration of hetastarch.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred in a patient after intravenous administration of hetastarch. The onset was acute within 3 hours after exposure to the agent and the course was fulminating. The patient died in 48 hours. Clinical, hematologic, and pathologic features are presented and possible pathophysiologic mechanism is discussed. In view of this experience and documented effects of hetastarch on coagulation, the use of hetastarch should be avoided if the patient has a history of coagulation disorder, and the patient receiving the agent should be closely monitored with appropriate coagulation tests.

Remission of chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis to busulfan treatment.

Three patients with chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis have responded to busulfan treatment with an excellent hematologic remission and reversal of myelofibrosis and myeloid metaplasia. Four months after busulfan therapy all three patients showed an improvement of hematocrit and hemoglobin and reduction of the number of leukoerythroblasts. Cellular bone marrow was re-established in two patients. A decrease of hepatomegaly and splenomegaly also occurred and was well correlated with the hematologic response. In one patient, when busulfan was discontinued for about 2 years after achieving an excellent remission, hematologic relapse was accompanied by increase of hepatomegaly and splenomegaly. When busulfan treatment was resumed, hematologic response and decrease of hepatomegaly and splenomegaly reoccurred. This observation has demonstrated the beneficial effect of busulfan in chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis; therefore, the role of busulfan in the management of this disease should be further investigated.

Neoplastic fever responds to the treatment of an adequate dose of naproxen.

Twenty-one patients with neoplastic fever due to malignancy were treated with naproxen. A prompt and complete lysis of fever was obtained in 20 patients within 12 hours when an adequate dose of naproxen was given, and a sustained normal temperature was maintained in all responding patients while receiving naproxen except for one in whom a low grade fever recurred. Lysis of fever usually was followed by excessive sweating and subjective symptomatic improvement. However, when naproxen was discontinued in ten patients, febrile state to the pretreatment level recurred in seven patients within three days. This observation suggests naproxen has a definite and effective antipyretic activity against neoplastic fever although it may recur as the drug is discontinued. Naproxen may be a useful adjunctive agent in patients with neoplastic fever for a short-term symptomatic relief.

Utility of naproxen in the differential diagnosis of fever of undetermined origin in patients with cancer.

The clinical utility of naproxen as an antipyretic agent was examined in the differential diagnosis of fever of undetermined origin in patients with cancer. Twenty-two patients with cancer and fever of undetermined origin for more than seven days were treated with naproxen to control fever when there was no evidence of infection after a careful initial evaluation, and in most cases, after failure of antibiotic therapy. In final analysis, none of five patients with infectious fever had responses to naproxen. In contrast, 14 of 15 patients with neoplastic fever showed a prompt, complete, and sustained lysis of fever within 24 hours after the initiation of naproxen treatment, and the patients also showed symptomatic improvement. One patient with neoplastic fever who did not have a response to naproxen had lysis of fever after the removal of necrotic tumor tissue. Two patients with fever from connective tissue disease had a partial lysis of fever in response to naproxen. These data suggest that naproxen specifically produces the lysis of neoplastic fever and, therefore, is a useful agent in assisting in the differential diagnosis of infectious fever and neoplastic fever in patients with cancer and fever of undetermined origin.